New research shows that THC affects epigenetics, triggering structural and regulatory changes in the DNA of users’ sperm.
As legal access to marijuana continues expanding across the US, more scientists are studying the effects of its active ingredient, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), in teens, adults, and pregnant women.
The new study suggests men in their child-bearing years should also consider how THC could affect their sperm and possibly the children they conceive during periods when they’ve been using the drug, much like previous research that has shown tobacco smoke, pesticides, flame retardants, and even obesity can alter sperm.
Experiments in rats and a study with 24 men found that THC appears to target genes in two major cellular pathways and alters DNA methylation, a process essential to normal development.
The researchers do not yet know whether users pass the DNA changes THC triggers to their children and what effects that could have.
“In terms of what it means for the developing child, we just don’t know.”
“What we have found is that the effects of cannabis use on males and their reproductive health are not completely null, in that there’s something about cannabis use that affects the genetic profile in sperm,” says Scott Kollins, professor in psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Duke University and senior author of the study in Epigenetics.
“We don’t yet know what that means, but the fact that more and more young males of child-bearing age have legal access to cannabis is something we should be thinking about,” Kollins says.
National research has shown a steady decline in the perceived risk of regular marijuana use. This, combined with the demand and wide availability of marijuana bred specifically to yield higher THC content, make this research especially timely, Kollins says.
The study defined regular users as those who smoked marijuana at least weekly for the previous six months. Researchers compared their sperm to those who had not used marijuana in the past six months and not more than 10 times in their lifetimes.
The higher the concentration of THC in the men’s urine, the more pronounced the genetic changes to their sperm were, the researchers found.
THC appeared to affect hundreds of different genes in rats and humans, but many of the genes did have something in common—they were associated with two of the same major cellular pathways, says lead author Susan K. Murphy, associate professor and chief of the reproductive sciences division in obstetrics and gynecology at Duke.
One of the pathways is involved in helping bodily organs reach their full size; the other pathway involves a large number of genes that regulate growth during development. Both pathways can become dysregulated in some cancers.
“In terms of what it means for the developing child, we just don’t know,” Murphy says. It’s unknown whether sperm THC affects could be healthy enough to even fertilize an egg and continue its development into an embryo, she says.
The study was a starting point on the epigenetic effects of THC on sperm and the relatively small number of men involved in the trial limited the study, Murphy says. Other factors affecting their health, such as their nutrition, sleep, alcohol use, and other lifestyle habits, could also confound the findings in men.
The team plans to continue its research with larger groups. They intend to study whether changes in sperm are reversed when men stop using marijuana. They also hope to test the umbilical cord blood of babies born to fathers with THC-altered sperm to determine what, if any epigenetic changes, carry forward to the child.
“We know that there are effects of cannabis use on the regulatory mechanisms in sperm DNA, but we don’t know whether they can be transmitted to the next generation,” Murphy says.
“In the absence of a larger, definitive study, the best advice would be to assume these changes are going to be there,” Murphy says. “We don’t know whether they are going to be permanent. I would say as a precaution, stop using cannabis for at least six months before trying to conceive.”
A grant from the John Templeton Foundation funded the study.
Source: Duke University